| Speed TD Cleat |
Since the beginning of high school the swarm of Nike apparel has taken over the industry of athletic attire, most commonly within the realm of football. It seems as though each year there are new shoes coming out, new styles of clothing, and most commonly for football, a new premiere football cleat. When I was a junior in high school, Nike came out with a new cleat called the Speed td’s which offered a light weight cleat that was flashy and comfortable. The next year Nike came out with a new style of cleat called the Vapor Jet td, which other than the newer style offered nothing different than the cleat I wore the year before. Now that I am in college the trend of Nike still continues to have an effect me as an athlete. The new Pro Combat style has become very popular in the college football era due to its flashy apparel, unique style and color, and comfort; however offer’s nothing significantly different than the cleats I purchased in high school.
So why is that I continued to purchase the newer model of cleat each year when I knew that the cleat didn’t offer anything considerably different than the cleats I already owned? This may seem like a rather pointless question with no real significance, there has to be a reason outside of the flashiness that sparked my interest to get a new pair. Although I couldn’t seem to come up with an even remotely logical explanation, after reading the Jacques Lacan’s Agency of The Letter In The Unconscious, I started to get a better sense of my addiction for new football cleats.
| Vapor Jet TD Cleat |
In his writing he portrays his disagreements with the famous and well known psychologist Sigmund Freud. Instead of agreeing with Freud’s theory of the unconscious human as being the id, ego, and super-ego, he instead believes that the unconscious is structured like language. You may be asking yourself now how exactly language is structured then, and he answers by use of metonymy and metaphor.
Lacan describes metonymy by saying that we as humans do not know exactly what we want, but rather the objects that we desire dictate what we want. In other words he says that we are never satisfied…because metonymy is never complete. In regards to metaphor, Lacan depicts it as being how all of this metonymy’s become subjects to our desires. Although this may seem very confusing and hard to understand, the theme of Lacan’s writing is that we as humans do not desire objects, but rather we desire the right to
desire.
| Nike Pro Combat Cleat |
When looking at my unhealthy addiction to purchasing the newest model of Nike football cleats, Lacan would say that I don’t actually need the new cleat in reality, however I enjoy the fact that I desire to purchase them. Although I have good quality cleats each year, the reason that I continue to purchase the newest pair of cleat is not due to lack of quality, but rather because I am never satisfied with the old pair; and seem to always be looking for the next new pair to come out. In other words this goes hand-in-hand with Lacan’s idea that we are never satisfied…because metonymy is never complete.
I really like how you brought Lacan into your post about Nike again, it relates to your other post about the Nike football uniforms but also shows another way that advertisements can get people to want things they already have or don't need at all. For instance, I recently bought a pair of nike running pants and the last time I went running was the tenth grade.
ReplyDeleteI also liked how you were able to bring Lacan into your blog about sports wear and associated it with your past blog. I had a similar experience when I was in gamestop looking around for games. I stumbled into the GameCube section and found an X-men game I used to play on the X-Box. seeing how cheap the game was I purchased, forgetting entirely that I don't own a Game Cube, and while I have a Wii I didn't have any controllers for a gamecube. My desire to buy something that I once enjoyed clouded my mind from the simple fact that at that time it was impossible for me to play it.
ReplyDeleteI'm starting to notice a certain trend for Nike posts on your blog. In all seriousness, though, it is interesting that you feel compelled to purchase the new cleat every year. It certainly demonstrates Lacan's thoughts on the materialist bit, but also ties in well with your earlier post talking about Naomi Kline's stuff in "No Logo." Perhaps its not your fault that you are the "wanting I" when Nike is so effectively advertising their new products and molding your thinking to the point where you need the new model of cleats, even though your old ones are likely still in good enough condition that you could play in them.
ReplyDeleteThe Nike example of buying new cleats every year was a really good way to show the theory in practice. it is very interesting that you would continue to buy them knowing fully well that you were only getting a flashier pair and nothing that would help you play football better. I agree with Jesse that Nike must do an incredible job at advertising these cleats in order to make so many people buy them who really don't need them.
Delete